A pocket guide to Shadow Music: A reaction

Only for the Shadows, their music, their members and Shadows-related activity

Moderators: David Martin, dave robinson, Iain Purdon, George Geddes

Re: A pocket guide to Shadow Music: A reaction

Postby RayL » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:35 pm

If I had a critism of both the Shadows and Ventures books it is only that the index of tunes is counter-intuitive - the name of the tune comes after the reference number.

In an index where one looks for a tune by looking at an alphabetical list (as one does in these books), then the reference number should follow the name of the tune.

ie it should be APACHE [12]
and not
[12] APACHE

Ray L
User avatar
RayL
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:25 pm
Location: Carshalton, Surrey
Full Real Name: Ray Liffen

Re: A pocket guide to Shadow Music: A reaction

Postby Moderne » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:33 pm

There seems to be something about The Shadows that inspires people to be slightly 'over the top' in the expression of their opinions sometimes...the bizarrely over-long Wikipedia entry is a case in point. In many ways 'the pocket guide to shadow music' is a highly informative entertaining read. But there are some entries where I feel the authors are 'inebriated by the exuberance of their verbosity' to quote my dad! A good example being The Modern Way: "Composer Bogdanovs...furnishes an equally robust, at times florid keyboard accompaniment. The style, elaborate to the point of self-indulgence, rather blunts the force of the song's message, already creaking under the weight of its obscurity/obscuranticism."

Just my opinion!!

Clive
Moderne
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:00 pm
Full Real Name: Clive Webb

Previous

Return to The Shadows

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests

Ads by Google
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.