alanbakewell wrote:I don't see a problem. The bloke has 100% positive feedback he must be O.K.
I'm not really doubting his authenticity, merely pointing out some slight anomolies, but mostly just amazed at the price anticipated for a guitar. If it had some sort of provenance, such as played and owned by . . . etc, I could perhaps understand someone wanting to own a specific piece of musical history. But my 1960s Flamingo Pink (as it was then known - Fiesta Red wasn't a paint colour name used back in that period) strat with rosewood fingerboard and single ply pleckplate, which I once owned in my long-gone youth, wasn't very good (putting it mildly) and certainly wouldn't compare well with my current mex strat in terms of sound quality or playability.
I can understand folk wanting to own an early strat for a multitude of reasons but if mine ever came up for auction I'd possibly make a reasonable bid on it purely as an item of personal nostalgia to hang on a wall, but even if it did play and sound well I'd certainly not consider paying this sort of money for it, even if I could afford to, which I can't. It's not sour grapes as such things have never struck me that way, merely mild astonishment.
If you picked up my old strat to play it, without being aware of its age etc, I doubt you'd choose it over another more recent item, which is why I didn't own it for long. Call me cynical, if you will, but I just feel some are cashing in on a mythology that in reality doesn't always bear close scrutiny or analysis. People are free to bid on and buy anything, of course.