Tone wrote:I had the opportunity to try out an original De Armond 610 pedal last week. It sounded great but I found that combining the vertical and horizontal movements and playing the right note at the right time was quite difficult.
The required degree of co-ordination comes with a bit of practice. The trick is always to use the pedal when playing amplified and to keep experimenting. After a while it becomes second nature and you don't even notice you're doing it.
As for the issue about zero volume with the pedal backed off, that is very desirable when the pedal is being used purely as a volume control, but when the volume function is being used as a musical effect, then as David said, the backed-off setting should not be zero volume, as it makes accurate control of a swell much more difficult and hard to gauge. The correct setting varies from pot to pot, but on a Boss pedal, I find that setting the parallel minimum volume control to "2" does the trick. That means that the pedal is still letting some signal through at minimum volume - about the same as the DeArmond does.
I bought a Fender tone/volume pedal a year or so back, and was dismayed to find that it reduces the output to zero when backed off - the more so because it lacks the all-important minimum volume pot which can ameliorate the problem. But Pete Phillips of SMSE came to the rescue, by fitting said parallel pot for me (it is mounted to the tuner output socket, which I don't use)
The news about a proposed new Burns model of the tone/vol pedal is interesting. Will it have the proper two-plane action for volume and tone?
JN