A point not mentioned so far in these discussions is where the designer has placed the standby switch in the circuit.
In
Standby Circuit 1 , the switch is after the reservoir and smoothing caps
If the rectifier is valve, then with the switch open (standby off) the capacitors will charge slowly as the rectifier warms up. They do not conduct dc so they are not a significant current drain on the rectifier when it is cold (non-conducting) and warming.
Once the rectifier and the output valves are hot, the Standby switch is closed. The output valves immediately want to draw current but this initial surge can be supplied both by the rectifier and by the capacitors. The initial load is shared and the rectifier is not stressed.
With Circuit 1, the Standby switch has a useful role.On the other hand, if the designer has placed the switch immediately after the rectifier, as in
Standby Circuit 2, then this is not good for the rectifier
If the standby switch is closed when the valves are hot, the rectifier has to withstand both the sudden drain from the output valves
and the instantanious charging current need by the capacitors. Result - a short life for the rectifier. With
Standby Circuit 2, it is better to turn on the Mains and Standby switches together.
Semiconductor rectifiers can be made to withstand higher peak currents, so the difference between Circuits 1 and 2 are not important in the same way.
Regarding the amplifiers in question, which type of circuit have the designers given them?
Ray L