Mike Honey wrote:Bit of old news . gibson have agreed to pay a fine and stop using the wood. end of?
They can hardly stop using mahogany, rosewood and ebony. At least one of those three will be found on any famous Gibson guitar. The other main ingredient is maple. It isn't used on every guitar, but is certainly in use for some necks and for body laminations. However, maple is plentiful and can be domestically-sourced.
Would a Gibson L-5C or Les Paul Custom be worth the name without an ebony fretboard? Would a J-200 seem as attractive with a fretboard made of "torrefied" (ie, scorched) maple instead of rosewood?
Anywhere this issue is discussed on-line (especially on usenet), the argument soon breaks down into two opposing political viewpoints. For Democrat supporters of Barack Obama, the federal government can currently do no wrong and Gibson... well... it bloody well has it coming - as much for making donations to the Republican Party and for running a non-union operation as for anything else. For Obama's opponents, the arguments work the opposite way round.
My fear is that among the party political stuff in an election year, the interests of the American guitar-building industry - an absolute world-beater and foreign currency spinner if left to its own devices - are being ignored by those in power in the USA.
Laws which prevent Gibson from using imported tropical hardwoods such as ebony and rosewood might just as well be re-written and simplified as the "American Guitars - Who Needs Them?" Bill 2012.