Moderators: David Martin, Iain Purdon, dave robinson, George Geddes
ecca wrote:'clearly defined recording parameters'
But most certainly not 'clearly defined playback parameters '
ecca wrote:I have to agree with you Dave.
There's no substitute for standing in front of the things being compared.
Computer recording and playback depends upon so many variables and types of equipment.
You have to witness the valve unit at a volume to appreciate it.
I have to say that I consider this poll to be complete nonsense.
Detailed Infinity wrote:Phil, as I see it,the only thing you've not done is to run your exercise past the stake holders first to see if they approve of your methods.
I see you've been a member since 2010, so you'll have picked up in that period that only one or two people can speak in what is called a 'straightforward manner'
The eTAPHW is a very good echo further developed by Eric Thacker, as great advocate of the VST world of production by PCs as I am and as an aside, who introduced the concept of the PSP608 and eTAP Engineer to him? I did. Yeh
Grrrrrreat
Bri
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest