Page 2 of 2

Re: The Secret Science of Pop

PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:44 pm
by cockroach
For some time, most media people worldwide seem to have been getting younger- probably 20-somethings...and somewhat older ones of 35-45 are considered virtually wise old gurus of everything...

Re: The Secret Science of Pop

PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:38 pm
by dave robinson
cockroach wrote:For some time, most media people worldwide seem to have been getting younger- probably 20-somethings...and somewhat older ones of 35-45 are considered virtually wise old gurus of everything...

N

Correct - and totally delusional.

Re: The Secret Science of Pop

PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:39 pm
by drakula63
To some degree, it wasn't a waste of time as it confirmed the general ignorance of the people running the media these days. It all began with the Beatles and anything and everything before that just doesn't matter. Sad, but worth knowing. Perhaps if there is enough of an outcry, the BBC will decide to make a programme that puts matters straight. Although I shan't be holding my breath waiting for it...

Re: The Secret Science of Pop

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:51 am
by Uncle Fiesta
drakula63 wrote: ... It all began with the Beatles and anything and everything before that just doesn't matter ...


To be fair, there is some validity in that, as the Beatles took their influence from virtually every type of music in existence, rather than just rock and roll.

Re: The Secret Science of Pop

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:58 am
by RayL
the Beatles took their influence from virtually every type of music in existence, rather than just rock and roll.


But only after they had been introduced to the pianist and oboe player, a Mr G. H. Martin*

*(also a record producer)