
noelford wrote:I suppose it helps to take into consideration how a guitar becomes 'road worn'. If it is in rough condition because it has been treated with no respect, I'd probably want to restore it. If it has simply succumbed to many years of hard and honest use, I'd prefer to give it a really good clean and leave it at that. Ecca refers to the problem of keeping an eye on resale value - a good point. If the guitar is purchased as an investment and not to be played, then it does make sense not to devalue it, but if it's one you intend to keep and play then you should do whatever you want to it to get the best out of it. As for paying good money for a new guitar that has been deliberately disfigured... well, don't get me started! In fact, a thought occurs to me. In many years time when today's 'roadworn' guitars become genuine vintages, how would you go about restoring them?!
noelford wrote: Ecca refers to the problem of keeping an eye on resale value - a good point. :
Billyboygretsch wrote: I decided to go the restore route. So far have had tremolo replated gold.
shakedown wrote:
It's not even that dirty, so even stripping it to clean might not be worth the effort and risk (of damage). But how long will I resist?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests